conret, the S.Pd. D. has no obyon to
the promulgation of the scheme. That interpretation
in for $158.eepin
m chown in
the conset: & the Scheme w. the fre
presumably had hem attrand, had not The question of "building haves' been
raised
Ind. them fore accept the Son's purporal
le
allow compensation for wildungs
? Ar appror scheme & the
notification B. (JW/15524)
It waschen.
I take it that an adherence to the principle stated in our desp. on 15822 would exclude practically all leases in
4. Kong from compensation for buildings. H. on the expiration of the leave; but M
Robinson proposes not to withdrew from
the approval given
on
29174/13.
The principle of compensation seems
to have been laid down
lain in 1898 without
between building
It
feems
to
Mr Chasuber-
any differentiation
& other leaves.
me that the petition
in 29174/13 would be adequately met
when
by the provisions for stanting the lessee an option of renewal on terms, suggested in 15822, the Gown does not desire to re-enter,
The aim
the petition
of
425
to
200
obtain concessions for certain Crown Lenees over
& above their legal rights:
consitional
need not scruple to modify the 29174/13
approval given
on
I would limit- the
ession
to the holders of these single terme leases (29144/13) 40
an option to
be fired by the
renew (when the Crown does not wish to
termas ne-enter) Crown. Even this similar case
140 was refused in in 1909 /24727/1909-)
Hall 20.11.
! The form of these melosed
A
14
in
substantially
Gulding hease for you years
with
With renewed matter for another 75 ceas.
may of
A
and I provider for comfurcation if the Land in lakens for public purposes deering the first term of 75 years for the escond thom of 75
years if the right of revered is exerccord) but not for compensation at the wind of the team for it. Expres by wfflux
The at the end of 75 years
of time
-
if not resund, or of 150 year
if renewed.
The
question
whether there she h
such compensation o
primarily
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.